The FAQyMe gene


Chapter 159

... shall not make any law for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion



Chapter 159  ... shall not make any law for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion

UPDATE: Sunday, July 22, 2018 2:02:56 PM

Take away the last avenue for the Catholic Church to remain a law unto itself by amending s116 of the Australian constitution

"The Commonwealth shall not make any law for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion"

Free exercise does not include the freedom to break or manipulate the laws of the country.

Breaking or forming the laws of the country as a means of covering up child sex crimes of clergy whilst simultaneously advising and lobbying governments on matters of law, equality, morality and the human rights of women and children is an act of subversion against the nation and the people of Australia

.

The assumption that all religions are without flaws (require no oversight) can not be applied given that there can be national security issues

In January 1941, acting pursuant to the National Security (Subversive Organisations) Regulations 1940,[2] the Government of Australia declared Jehovah's Witnesses to be "prejudicial to the defence of the Commonwealth"

An issue becomes a national interest when dealing with a subversive organisation

The question that may need to be asked is did the cover up as shown by the royal commission and subsequent cases subvert or attempt to subvert or undermine the power and authority of any Australian government institutions? If the answer were to be Yes then they potentially could be outlawed under the same laws as the Jehovahs

My line of thinking has been an institution would commonly be seen as a moral danger when a measurable percentage (1%) of its leadership have been found to have engaged in the covering up of sex crimes against children committed by fellow clergy.

In the Catholic instance the Royal Commission found in hundreds of Catholic institutions had a measurable percentage of rapist clergy in excess of 6% and in instances higher than 60%. The fact that more than 60,000 children were found to have been sexually abused with more than 60% of those in Catholic institutions it requires more than a leap of faith to see this organisation anything other than of moral danger and a menace to society and that would be the first of many obvious attempts to subvert the course of justice in Australia. The act of defending the Church in defiance of the law or the intention of the law is there and must have taken place on many occasions (became commonplace - as a part of a Christian culture.

Was the intention of 116 one that would permit the takeover of the day to day management and operation of the country by a single religion such as Christianity and did it intend that a single religion should usurp the role of moral authority and ethical advisory while moving rapist clergy from parish to parish and denying the right to justice of survivors who attempted to come forward under the protection of the laws of Australia. They were hijacked right back to their abusers and the only legislation that has the ability to achieve that is the free exercise clause in s116.

An institution would commonly be seen as a moral danger when a measurable percentage (1%) of its leadership have been found to have engaged in the covering up of sex crimes against children committed by fellow clergy.

In the Catholic instance the Royal Commission found in hundreds of Catholic institutions had a measurable percentage of rapist clergy in excess of 6% and in instances higher than 60%. The fact that more than 60,000 children were found to have been sexually abused with more than 60% of those in Catholic institutions it requires more than a leap of faith to see this organisation anything other than of moral danger and a menace to society.

Did the cover up as shown by the royal commission and subsequent cases subvert or attempt to subvert or undermine the power and authority of any Australian government institutions or does this show that there were countless acts that had the intent to pervert the course of justice across the country when it came to the sexual abuse of children by clergy?

Given that section 116 excludes the Catholic religion from all or any forms of law, regulation covering equality, justice and human rights without suitable moral and ethical requirements let alone the need for evidence and oversight is an abrogation of the ethical responsibility of every Australian and every Australian politician.

Gone are the days of the Catholic Church being a law unto itself? Those days are still here with s116

Take away the last avenue for the Catholic Church to remain a law unto itself by amending s116 of the Australian constitution.

In Krygger and Williams the court stated "the doing of acts which are done in the practise of religion. To require a man to do a thing which has nothing at all to do with religion is not prohibiting him from a free exercise of religion. It may be that a law requiring a man to do an act which his religion forbids would be objectionable on moral grounds, but it does not come within the prohibition of sec. 116, and the justification for a refusal to obey a law of that kind must be found elsewhere.". This indicates that the authority is there should the court be requested to define it.

Sec. 116 of the Constitution provides that "the Commonwealth shall not make any law for . . . prohibiting the free exercise of any religion " - that is, prohibiting the practice of religion - the doing of acts which are done in the practise of religion. Krygger and Williams [How is the doing of the acts of child rape when carried out by the religious as though it were a right of theirs to rape women and children as that may help the cleric on his journey to heaven or sainthood.]

No one can doubt that the defence of his country is almost, if not quite, the first duty of a citizen, and there is no room for doubt that the legislature has power to enact laws to provide for making citizens competent for that duty. Krygger and Williams

To require a man to do a thing which has nothing at all to do with religion is not prohibiting him from a free exercise of religion. It may be that a law requiring a man to do an act which his religion forbids would be objectionable on moral grounds, but it does not come within the prohibition of s 116. Krygger and Williams

.

Divider - dont forget to donate so we can keep on with education to protect children - hope you benefitted from reading this

The best advice I can give with regard to recovery from trauma is to explore your attachments and/or other relationship vulnerabilities safely with evidence based trauma informed specialists or you can privately Learn the Science of Healthy Attachment Relationships in a safe, low cost self timed manner.

*I have no financial connection nor do I receive any reward for promoting effective treatment other than knowing that others can and do benefit greatly from them as I have.

I was fortunate enough to have obtained the services of Dr Julian Lim when he working in my city but unfortunately we lost connection for a while. Reconnecting with an experienced and well qualified trauma informed evidence based professional making him the safest and the most knowledgeable I have engaged with and this has been transformational for me. Dr Lim has my full and confident recommendation. Dr Julian Lim

JohnB

.

Divider - dont forget to donate so we can keep on with education to protect children - hope you benefitted from reading this

Recently published :
      Chapter 233
- Life after the Lim Report - AddNewNewTitle
      Chapter 232
- Life after the Lim Report - What if the whole God thing is a hoax?
      Chapter 231
- Life after the Lim Report - Catholic denial of justice is a Human Rights crime
      Chapter 230
- Life after the Lim Report - Why an elected Christian representative this election may be harmful to Australia's children
      Chapter 229
- Life after the Lim Report - One pedophile priest survivor in Toowoomba, Queensland, gives City of Angels Blog his take on the Royal Inquiry
      Chapter 228
- Life after the Lim Report - The Decree Crimen - a Secular Perspective

The FAQyMe Gene & the lifelong search for safe, moral and ethical social justice, the Human Right to a trauma informed and evidence based recovery and social re-engagement unhindered by the fear, anger, blockages or projections from other people's gods - #CoverUpDay737,600

.

Divider - dont forget to donate so we can keep on with education to protect children - hope you benefitted from reading this

You can donate via the buy button

APRIL 3 2019 - 5:30PM - Clergy sex abuse survivor Paul Levey sues Catholic Church and includes why many survivors do not seek compensation via politicians, police or the criminal justice system. You can read Paul's first public statement about his experience which was first published here in 2016 For those who don't know my story here it is. Paul Levey Paul thumbed the entire document on his mobile one letter at a time.

John Brown was born in Yea Victoria 3717 on 27 December, 1948. John grew up in Yea, he went to the Catholic school on The Parade Yea and then a final year at Yea High school in Station Street. He undertook an apprenticeship as a Hand and Machine Compositor/Linotype Mechanic at the local newspaper The Yea Chronicle who recently declined to publish John's story. John left Yea after realising that the proprietor and local policeman Bill Ellison along with other local Catholics in his hometown and surrounds at that time were well aware of his abuse and of the rape and abuse of other children in Yea and district and were aware of the many events surrounding the murder of Herbert Henry Kemp of Yea ...... read more and more and more and Site Map

Investigation of an unsolved murder in 1962 can no longer be investigated according to police taskforce SANO because a different pedophile Catholic clergyman who raped a child at age 8 is now dead. As a result of the dead rapist being unconnected with the murder Victorian police remain clue less.

Later in life John married in Toowoomba only to begin the most bizarre period in his life as he learned that he wasnow related by marriage to the then bishop of Toowoomba Bill Morris. Morris was the head of the bishops conference at that time and was the "Go to" person in the country for survivors of childhood sexual abuse by Catholic clergy and yet I was never able to get a time or a conversation with the bishop. I did get conversations or connection with a number of Catholic organisations with varying degrees of weirdness some of which I have written about in my blog The FAQyMe Gene & the lifelong search for safe, moral and ethical social justice, the Human Right to a trauma informed and evidence based recovery and social re-engagement unhindered by the fear, anger, blockages or projections from other people's gods .

John is author and publisher of #TraumaTheory and regularly blogs at The FAQyMe Gene on his journey, recovery and the horror and the scale of this global issue.

John's personal story is just another from the hundreds of millions of other stories across the globe eminating from the human rights abuses and ongoing horrors of the systemic rape, abuses of trust, fraud, deception and cover up in the global Catholic and other religions. Like those others his "issues in life" arose and remain simply because his abusers as a child were just like theirs in that their rapists and abusers were Catholic or Catholic or Christian clergy and they too remain ineligible or unable to have their human rights upheld in their lifetime..

Copyright The FAQyMe Gene © 2019. Site Map