The inability of a child to thrive in a constitutionally protected God based death and rape culture is not a fault of the child.
Sunday, 21 July 2019 11:55:55 AM
"The Commonwealth shall not make any law for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion"
Free exercise does not include the freedom to break the laws of the country.
Breaking or forming the laws of the country as a means of covering up child sex crimes of clergy whilst simultaneously advising and lobbying governments on matters of law, equality, morality and the human rights of women and children is an act of subversion against the nation and the people of Australia.
The assumption that all religions are without flaws (require no oversight) can not be applied given that there can be national security issues
In January 1941, acting pursuant to the National Security (Subversive Organisations) Regulations 1940,[2] the Government of Australia declared Jehovah's Witnesses to be "prejudicial to the defence of the Commonwealth"
An issue becomes a national interest when dealing with a subversive organisation
The question that may need to be asked is did the cover up as shown by the royal commission and subsequent cases subvert or attempt to subvert or undermine the power and authority of any Australian government institutions? If the answer were to be Yes then they potentially could be outlawed under the same laws as the Jehovahs
My line of thinking has been an institution would commonly be seen as a moral danger when a measurable percentage (1%) of its leadership have been found to have engaged in the covering up of sex crimes against children committed by fellow clergy.
In the Catholic instance the Royal Commission found in hundreds of Catholic institutions had a measurable percentage of rapist clergy in excess of 6% and in instances higher than 60%. The fact that more than 60,000 children were found to have been sexually abused with more than 60% of those in Catholic institutions it requires more than a leap of faith to see this organisation anything other than of moral danger and a menace to society and that would be the first of many obvious attempts to subvert the course of justice in Australia. The act of defending the Church in defiance of the law or the intention of the law is there and must have taken place on many occasions (became commonplace - as a part of a Christian culture.
Was the intention of 116 one that would permit the takeover of the day to day management and operation of the country by a single religion such as Christianity and did it intend that a single religion should usurp the role of moral authority and ethical advisory while moving rapist clergy from parish to parish and denying the right to justice of survivors who attempted to come forward under the protection of the laws of Australia. They were hijacked right back to their abusers and the only legislation that has the ability to achieve that is the free exercise clause in s116.
An institution would commonly be seen as a moral danger when a measurable percentage (1%) of its leadership have been found to have engaged in the covering up of sex crimes against children committed by fellow clergy.
In the Catholic instiance the Royal Commission found in hundreds of Catholic institutions had a measurable percentage of rapist clergy in excess of 6% and in instances higher than 60%. The fact that more than 60,000 children were found to have been sexually abused with more than 60% of those in Catholic institutions it requires more than a leap of faith to see this organisation anything other than of moral danger and a menace to society.
Did the cover up as shown by the royal commission and subsequent cases subvert or attempt to subvert or undermine the power and authority of any Australian government institutions or does this show that there were countless acts that had the intent to pervert the course of justice across the country when it came to the sexual abuse of children by clergy?
Recently published :
Chapter 292 Ozi Ozi Ozi Oi Oi we still get paranoid about human rights in Australia
Chapter 291 The shame of being connected with the Catholic Church
Chapter 290 Where to now for finding safe secular services?
Chapter 289 A week in my words
Chapter 288 Australia andf it's inappropriate response to child sexual abuse
Chapter 287 A democracy only represents the majority
You can directly support my work at PayPal John A Brown.
John Brown is an Australian First Fleet descendent born into a constitutionally protected God based, death obsessed, rape, blackmail and exploitation oriented religious culture. He is the author, developer and publisher of Trauma in Religion a theory that describes the origins of the human rights abuses the Catholic Church inflicts on Catholic children globally. Google #TraumaTheory
When not seeking evidence and proofs to invalidate his hypothesis John blogs erratically here, most often without commas or other punctuation, linguistic identity or grammatical rules in his own unique self acquired style about his personal experiences on a range of topics that interest or affect himself and other survivors where he writes of his successes and failures in his task of obtaining only trauma informed and evidence based secular professional care and services and in necessary engagements with the judiciary and government.
His interests include Human Rights for all Australians that should act as a clear boundary for all institutions regardless of an institutions or individuals thoughts on their favorite supreme being, gods, demons or spirits engaging in secular Australian communities; trauma and recovery from the crimes, criminal and psychological behaviours of the product of generations of the hijacking of a favored social position by a rape encultured clergy and the helpless aiding and abetting by fearful bonded Catholics in modern secular Australia have been a life-long interest.
John sees the need to promote equality and human rights through the need for safety and equality in community as well as in care and education systems when it comes to religious beliefs as a result of directly experiencing and learning that millions of others experienced similar pathological use of religious beliefs including extortion, bribery, blackmail and through doctrinal failures such as the forgiveness process as practised in the Catholic world.
As one only example of this in the world of business and governance, the reality is that "Twenty-three of the 25 biggest private welfare agencies in Australia are faith-based". John contends that this does not reflect the needs or the sentiments of the Australian community and directly fails the 60,000 who came forward to the Royal Commission, their families and the millions who are waiting for real signs of safety so that they too can come forward and begin their recovery.
This experience has added to his interests that go on to include the many abuses of the continuing criminal cover up on his FAQyMe Gene blog.
John likes to be able to inform people of things that bring benefit that can relieve the psychological suffering that he knows so many Catholic children still suffer from daily.. As well many now elderly are confused and suffer also as the truth and the reality of the global scale of the criminal activity of their clergy and accomplices is brought to the world.
John found it was good advice with regard to recovery from trauma to explore attachment or other relationships and safety vulnerabilities with evidence based trauma informed specialists or you can privately Learn the Science of Healthy Attachment Relationships in a safe, low cost self timed manner.
He finds the brain chemical, brain disease and medication model to be a seriously flawed monster and the medication regime to be abhorrent and inhumane with a strong taint of cooperation with the covering up of child rape and other crimes.
John was fortunate enough to have obtained the services of Dr Julian Lim when he was working in Toowoomba but unfortunately lost connection for a period of time. Reconnecting with an experienced and well qualified trauma informed evidence based professional make him the safest and the most knowledgeable professional John has engaged with and this has been transformational for him. Dr Lim has his full and confident recommendation. Dr Julian Lim Dr Lim has a noted place among those people who have had a positive influence on his life.