The level of protection they receive has been seriously dented. Has it been dented enough to allow the aspirations of wartime Australians for all Australians to be protected by basic human rights. That obviously has not worked in our favor as can be seen by the push to divide the people on religious grounds through enshrining freedom of religion laws instead of human rights for all of Australia people?

I keep asking the question - would the journey of victims of the horrendous crimes committed against children since federation have been able to continue for more than a hundred years before it came to the notice of Prime Minister Julia Gillard without the pressures of institutions with a vested interest in covering child rape and other crimes?

Would their journey have been more humane than the repeat trauma that survivors must experience over again and again in an adversarial style of justice system?

Already the court systems are clogging due to the high number who are openly rejecting the abhorrent and disingenuous inappropriately named redress scheme.

The cost in lives and in social harm and family breakdown as a direct result are a horror on their own that with rare exception have we found men and women who take their responsibility to represent all Australians equally and fairly.

Every politician today who has not spoken out on these atrocities and who has or continues to defraud the people through claims of connectedness with a benevolent deity need to be rejected at the ballot box and replaced by those who take their representative responsibilities seriously by promoting a Bill of Rights for all Australians instead of shoring up the current and future crops of failed religions and their failed gods at least until we have an evidence based way of validating each and every one of their claims to ensure they do not breach the human rights of children and other Australians.