The inability of a child to thrive in a Constitutionally protected God based perpetual threat and rape culture is not a fault of the child; however it does become their odious responsibility upon reaching adulthood.
It is noted that the claim of holding evidence by Robert Brown showing that I am a fraud has not been mentioned since internal inquiries were made via Peter O'Callaghan's office.
The question remains as to whether Robert Brown actually has evidence to support his statement that he has evidence to prove that I was not abused as a child and if so where is that evidence.
Similar questions have to be asked as to the reasons why O'Callaghan dropped my claim based on the statement of my sister Janette who was around 4 years of age when I was abused by O'Donnell and I am at a loss as to what she may know that would prove that I was not abused as a child by Catholic clergy
Holder of evidence not born at this stage
My abuse as a 3.5 year old occurred before my sister was born, does her statement go to my claim re my abuse before she was born?
One has to ask if this is another instance where events some 30 years after my abuse can be claimed as evidence that I was not abused as a child by Catholic clergy.
Also of note is that when asked for copies of transcript of interview with other family members (who have advised as to what they provided to O'Callaghan and that that flies in the face of claims by my sister and brother) and those copies of transcripts can no longer be found according to O'Callaghan's office. In order for those statements to have any legal standing they must be produced else those claims of statement cannot be substantiated and can only be seen as vexatious.
Another bout of events happening many years after my abuse being used to deny my abuse. The lack of logic and reason in that is simply staggering.
Events some 6 years after my abuse at 8 years of age have been deemed sufficient by Peter O'Callaghan to deny my claim. This 6 years later claim has been ceased upon by Peter O'Callaghan to deny my claim and in that process has denied me my right to justice.
My claim now is that Peter O'Callaghan and his use of spurious "evidence" some 6 years later to deny me my natural right to justice.
It happened and then it didn't
The events referred to by Peter O'Callaghan are events that took place some 6 years after my abuse by O'Donnell. Attempts to obtain information about these claims have proved unsuccessful as Peter O'Callaghan is unwilling to provide copies of the statement by my sister that relate to those events some 6 years after my abuse.
. 
Why do some pages require a token? There is only a small number of these due to confidentiality, incomplete, not ready for release yet, content for specific purposes or individuals.
You can directly support my work at PayPal John A Brown. Read more about John Brown here